DefMod Syntax

[Tom Hughes]

In message <vMQCbJAU$e14Ew1V at mk-net.demon.co.uk>
          Tony van der Hoff <OSLib at mk-net.demon.co.uk> wrote:

> On Fri, 17 Mar 2000, at 18:47:50, Tom Hughes <tom at compton.nu> wrote on
> the subject "DefMod Syntax":
>
> >Plus the base structure is already in use with the current names
> >so we can't change them very easily.
>
> I read that as agreeing with my philosophy?

Well I thought I was disagreeing but maybe I misunderstood you ;-)

I thought you were saying that you changed flags to gadgetflags in
the base struct to avoid clashes with members called flags in the
various derived structs.

I was saying that I thought it better to leave the base struct alone
and rename the flags members in any derived structs that clashed.

Tom

-- 
Tom Hughes (tom at compton.nu)
http://www.compton.nu/
...He's dead, Jim ...Kick him if you don't believe me