Iconbar patch

[Tony van der Hoff]

On 5 Nov 2001, in message <e2d7e2d44a.tom at compton.compton.nu>,
Tom Hughes <tom at compton.nu> wrote:

> In message <c947c7d44a.Tony at mk-net.demon.co.uk>
>           Tony van der Hoff <tony at mk-net.demon.co.uk> wrote:
> 
> > I may have misunderstood the intent here, but I believe, as a matter of
> > policy, we should no longer be supporting old style structures. Naturally,
> > where they're already defined, we should leave them, for compatibility, but
> > is it necessary to introduce additional ones? What is the gain?
> 
> Well I still use the 'old' style structures. I'm certainly not
> going to start mixing the two styles in the same program. I don't
> think I've started any new programs since we added the 'new' style
> structures so I haven't yet had to decide which style I will use
> in such a case.
> 
> Don't forget that I was one of the people that didn't really see
> the problem and was quite happy using the 'old' style.
> 
> In this case it isn't clear to me that the old definition is in
> any way correct as it is very different to the new ones...
> 

OK, patch committed for 6.30.

-- 
Tony van der Hoff         | MailTo:tony at mk-net.demon.co.uk
                          | MailTo:avanderhoff at iee.org
Buckinghamshire, England  | http:www.mk-net.demon.co.uk