8 bit os_f handles
David J. Ruck
druck at freeuk.com
Wed Mar 29 17:54:59 BST 2000
On Wed 29 Mar, Daniel Ellis wrote:
> Tom Hughes writes:
> > Surely the
> > point here though is that any code using os_f will have to include
> > os.h either directly or indirectly, and the Makefile would normally
> > have a dependency on that for any source file using os_f.
>
> Precisely. The only ambiguity is whether the date stamp on os.h is
> sufficiently late enough. If you unpack an archive the files will
> usually have date stamps according to their source, so if I recompiled
> my sources yesterday, the new library was written the day before
> yesterday, and I install it today, then I don't suppose my code will
> get remade by the make utility...
This is why you do a make all after installing new libraries. If you
think users are not aware of this is, it should be stipulated in the
library instalation instructions.
Cheers
---Dave
--
______________________________________________________________________
David J. Ruck Phone: 07974 108301 Email: druck at freeuk.com
______________________________________________________________________
More information about the oslib-user
mailing list