OSLib 6.11 Released

[David Bryan]

David J. Ruck wrote:

> On 27 Sep 2000 "Jonathan Coxhead" <jonathan at doves.demon.co.uk> wrote:
> >    No, the present situation is the "other way up". What Chris suggests is 
> > the following:
> > 
> >       $
> >          OSLib
> >             Core
> >                oslib
> >                  h
> >                     os
> >                     osbyte
> 
> [Snip]
>  
> >    This is good, as it keeps the interface clean: there is 1 reserved name
> > ---"oslib"---that appears in source code:
> > 
> >       #include "oslib/os.h"
> >       etc.
> 
> Excellent Jon.

Excellent Chris?  You don't even need to use "oslib/os.h" within
the library, "os.h" will do.

-- 
David Bryan