32bit OSLibSupport

[Tony van der Hoff]

On 25 Oct 2002, in message <4b8ae6ed7cJeremy at omba.demon.co.uk>,
Jeremy C B Nicoll <Jeremy at omba.demon.co.uk> wrote:

> In article <44c7578a4b.Tony at mk-net.demon.co.uk>,
>    Tony van der Hoff <tony at mk-net.demon.co.uk> wrote:
> 
> > www.sourceforge.net/projects/ro-oslib
> 
> Another stupid question... does everyone who is about to use a version of
> OSLib need to get the source and (re-)build the lib?  Or is that only
> required if you want to consider making changes to the library functions?
> 

The binaries will continue to be available at mk-net. However, they are only
updated on a 6 monthly basis, unless there is a major change, and therefore
building your own may get you a later version. Normally, this won't seriously
interest anyone, the standard releases being adequate. I need to update
mk-net/OSLib to point at SourceForge for the sources.

However, I no longer intend to maintain the sources at mk-net, and will
delete them in time. In the longer term, I will move the entire mk-net/OSLib
tree, including the binaries, to SourceForge. I just haven't got around to
fulfilling all my great ideas yet ;-)
 
-- 
Tony van der Hoff         | MailTo:tony at mk-net.demon.co.uk
                          | MailTo:avanderhoff at iee.org
Buckinghamshire, England  | http:www.mk-net.demon.co.uk