OSLib Unix-build
Tony van der Hoff
tony at mk-net.demon.co.uk
Tue Apr 15 17:45:37 BST 2003
On 15 Apr 2003, in message <e61a92e34b.sbrodie at sbrodie.cam.pace.co.uk>,
Stewart Brodie <stewart.brodie at pace.co.uk> wrote:
> In message <128089e34b.philip at philipnet.com>
> Philip Ludlam <philip at philipnet.com> wrote:
>
> > On 15 Apr, in message <c4ea81e34b.Tony at mk-net.demon.co.uk>
> > Tony van der Hoff <tony at mk-net.demon.co.uk> wrote:
> >
> > [snip]
> >
> > > What I'm proposing is to use the syntax of the newer make files in the
> > > build process; this won't affect users, only developers; most of these
> > > will be using the newer tools and/or GCC anyway.
> >
> > Most/all the developers which use OSLib just download the release
> > archives. I don't think that changing to the new compiler suite will
> > disadvantage anyone, and its use will ease development.
> > I'll be surprised if there was a developer who wanted to compile OSLib
> > and who didn't have the latest Castle compiler.
>
> I don't have it - but then again, I probably don't want to build OSLib :-)
>
Bet you've got something much better :-)
--
Tony van der Hoff | MailTo:tony at mk-net.demon.co.uk
| MailTo:avanderhoff at iee.org
Buckinghamshire, England | http:www.mk-net.demon.co.uk
More information about the oslib-user
mailing list