Building OSLib under Linux

[David J. Ruck]

Tony van der Hoff <tony at mk-net.demon.co.uk> wrote:

> Philip Ludlam <philip at philipnet.com> wrote in message
> <b47e68974c.philip at philipnet.com>
> > You might have to. It doesn't know about C99
> >   cc1: unknown C standard `C99'
> 
> OK, I see. It wouldn't be too hard to fix this sort of thing, except that
> I dont't really feel kike installing gcc 2.9, for fear of breaking my 3.2
> installation, which I'm using quite extensively for other projects. If you
> would care to send me a patch list, I'd be quite happy to adopt it.
> 
> On the other hand, what do others think? Is it worth maintaining 2.9
> compatibility, simce I'm almost bound to unwittingly break it again in the
> future?

Is C99 only an issue building under GCC on non-RISC OS? If it affects the
RISC OS build, there might be problems for people using the 26bit compilers
/ SCL. Although I suspect not many people with old development environments
will bother rebuilding OSLib.

Cheers
---Dave

-- 
Email: druck at druck.org.uk
Phone: +44- (0)7974 108301
  Web: http://www.druck.org.uk/