Building OSLib under Linux

[Philip Ludlam]

On 30 Mar, in message <gemini.hvdxo300e6jmo032i.tony at mk-net.demon.co.uk>
  Tony van der Hoff <tony at mk-net.demon.co.uk> wrote:

>"David J. Ruck" <druck at druck.org.uk> wrote in message
><gemini.hvdwm1002v240013c.druck at druck.org.uk>
>
>> Tony van der Hoff <tony at mk-net.demon.co.uk> wrote:
>> 
>> > Philip Ludlam <philip at philipnet.com> wrote in message
>> > <b47e68974c.philip at philipnet.com>
>> > > You might have to. It doesn't know about C99
>> > >   cc1: unknown C standard `C99'

[snip]

>> > Is it worth maintaining 2.9 compatibility, simce I'm almost bound
>> > to unwittingly break it again in the future?

[snip]

>However, we abandoned supporting the older tools a year or so ago (after a
>staw poll here) in order to use the better facilities provided by the latest
>AMU. So, whilst C99 is not a problem, it won't be easy to build OSLib with
>the older tools.

I remember that I agreed with the stance of abandoning support for the
older tools. Therefore I am quite happy for there to be no support for
versions of GCC which don't support C99.

So, until I upgrade my devel Linux box (there's no timescale for that
I'm afraid :-) ) I won't be able to test the linux build environment :-(
.

Yours,

Phil L.
-- 
http://www.philipnet.com | http://director.sourceforge.net