SWI PSR corruption

[Stewart Brodie]

Christian Ludlam <chris at recoil.org> wrote:

> On 28 Apr Stewart Brodie wrote:
> 
> > Christian Ludlam <chris at recoil.org> wrote:
> > 
> > > When you build an application targeting 32 bit OSs, it seems you MUST
> > > use the -zpq512 compiler switch to tell the compiler that inline SWI
> > > calls corrupt the PSR (why this isn't the default I don't know).
> > 
> > I thought that was the one that stopped multiple calls to malloc being
> > optimised away, no?
> 
> Hmm, my reference was
>
<http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~theom/riscos/docs/low/norcroft-qpragmas.txt>
> 

OK - i was thinking of -zpq32.


-- 
Stewart Brodie