OSLib and ELF

David J. Ruck druck at druck.org.uk
Wed Apr 11 22:27:54 BST 2007


On 11 Apr 2007 Erik Groenhuis <e.groenhuis at xs4all.nl> wrote:
> As Tony van der Hoff wrote on 11 Apr 2007:
> 
>> Whilst I would agree that it is desirable to maintain native build
>> capability, if the choice, dictated by developer availability, has to be
>> between adding ELF support and maintaining native build capability, what
>> should we choose?
> 
> Is there realy such a hard choice between a native build capability and
> ELF support, or is this a false dilemma?
> 
> Are there technical reasons why we cannot have them both? Are there
> other reasons?

Given how simple OSLib is, being assembler veneers rather than C code, 
I could knock something up to convert it from AOF/ALF to ELF/AR quite 
easily. Should easily quadruple the size of the binary, if nothing 
else.

Cheers
---Dave

-- 
______________________________________________________________________

David J. Ruck   Phone: +44- (0)7974 108301   Email: druck at druck.org.uk
______________________________________________________________________



More information about the oslib-user mailing list