OSLib and ELF
David J. Ruck
druck at druck.org.uk
Wed Apr 11 22:27:54 BST 2007
On 11 Apr 2007 Erik Groenhuis <e.groenhuis at xs4all.nl> wrote:
> As Tony van der Hoff wrote on 11 Apr 2007:
>
>> Whilst I would agree that it is desirable to maintain native build
>> capability, if the choice, dictated by developer availability, has to be
>> between adding ELF support and maintaining native build capability, what
>> should we choose?
>
> Is there realy such a hard choice between a native build capability and
> ELF support, or is this a false dilemma?
>
> Are there technical reasons why we cannot have them both? Are there
> other reasons?
Given how simple OSLib is, being assembler veneers rather than C code,
I could knock something up to convert it from AOF/ALF to ELF/AR quite
easily. Should easily quadruple the size of the binary, if nothing
else.
Cheers
---Dave
--
______________________________________________________________________
David J. Ruck Phone: +44- (0)7974 108301 Email: druck at druck.org.uk
______________________________________________________________________
More information about the oslib-user
mailing list