Linking OSLib Support

[Tony van der Hoff]

On Thu, 28 Dec 2000, at 01:32:52, John Tytgat <John.Tytgat at aaug.net>
wrote on the subject "Linking OSLib Support":

>
>You clearly can see that they are not binary compatible.  As I said
>before, you might be very lucky and get away with a tiny library
>like OSLibSupport but it is a timebomb ticking... <run & hide> ;-)
>

Ok, I see what you're saying - it isn't just failure to link. 

I'm hesitant to publish another version of the binary; potentially
making 4 variants, if 32-bit options are also to be provided (Ok, I know
UnixLib can't do that - yet). I guess the solution is to remove all
dependency on standard headers from OSLibSupport . 

Certainly stdio could and should be dropped in favour of OSLib calls.
Presumably one can't go far wrong if the header contents are the same
between the libraries?
-- 
Tony van der Hoff         |  mailto:OSLib at mk-net.demon.co.uk
Buckinghamshire, England  |  http://www.mk-net.demon.co.uk/oslib/
----------------------------------------------------------------