Linking OSLib Support

[John Tytgat]

In message <fDV+IEAeMxS6EwTF at mk-net.demon.co.uk>
          Tony van der Hoff <OSLib at mk-net.demon.co.uk> wrote:

> I'm hesitant to publish another version of the binary; potentially
> making 4 variants, if 32-bit options are also to be provided (Ok, I know
> UnixLib can't do that - yet). I guess the solution is to remove all
> dependency on standard headers from OSLibSupport.

I think it should be documented and each developer can build the variant
s/he needs.

> Certainly stdio could and should be dropped in favour of OSLib calls.
> Presumably one can't go far wrong if the header contents are the same
> between the libraries?

I guess so, but for a such a small library, I guess most developpers can
build the version they need.

John.
-- 
John Tytgat, in his comfy chair at home                                 BASS
John.Tytgat at aaug.net                             ARM powered, RISC OS driven