Current Status of OSLib

[Steve Fryatt]

On 19 Jan, Tony van der Hoff via oslib-user wrote in message
    <82ec4b51-f1d9-ca48-b159-92f0a1cfe7df at vanderhoff.org>:

> 
> 
> On 16/01/2021 17:53, Steve Fryatt wrote:
> > On 16 Jan, Tony van der Hoff via oslib-user wrote in message
> >      <b7b5846c-899c-1347-ffbd-ea0b3d8837e0 at vanderhoff.org>:
> 
> > I would be happy to step forward, if it would be of any help -- I'll
> > drop you an email off-list with my SourceForge details.
> > 
> 
> OK Steve, thanks for stepping forward, so keeping this project alive. I've
> added your user to the full admin group.

No problem; as a long-term user, there's a certain amount of self-interest
in keeping the project going!

:-)

> I was hoping others might stick their heads above the parapet in this
> thread, but so far only Druck has made a comment. You were correct
> inasmuch that John T fixed the definitions over the past few years, but no
> full release was ever made. So that needs to be done soon.
> 
> I'm not for the time being in a position to make a new release myself, but
> if you could set about that, it wuuld be great.

It might be an idea to see if any gaps can be identified in the RO5 API
coverage first, although generally when I've looked for things, they've
already been included. Given the recent release of 5.28, perhaps aiming to
get OSLib in line with that would be a sensible target?

I'm not sure if Druck (or anyone else) has any specific gaps in mind?

-- 
Steve Fryatt - Leeds, England

http://www.stevefryatt.org.uk/